War on Ivermectin: the Medicine that Saved Millions and Could Have Ended the Pandemic by Pierre Kory

Author:Pierre Kory
Language: eng
Format: epub
ISBN: 9781510773875
Publisher: Skyhorse
Published: 2023-07-15T00:00:00+00:00

Web searches did not identify any additional interests that could be perceived to affect an individual’s objectivity and independence during the development of the recommendations.

What an absolute travesty. Individual researchers are obligated to report conflicts of interest voluntarily; it’s basic, baseline scientific integrity. I have never ever heard of looking for conflicts of interest using “web searches.” I have effectively run out of words to describe the nefariousness of these actions. Clown World had erected a spiffy new big top.

What Owen and his colleagues at the WHO did to suppress the evidence of ivermectin’s efficacy in their Therapeutic and Covid-19 Living Guideline document was so openly corrupt, I quickly started writing a white paper9 (basically an in-depth research article) about their brazen manipulations of the evidence. I spent weeks on it, extensively detailing how they had whittled down the evidence base to as few trials as possible, using arbitrary exclusion criteria. Then they graded the handful of remaining trials that showed large, positive effects as “low quality” and a large Pharma-conflicted trial that showed no benefit as “high quality.” What is fascinating is that despite the fact that even amongst the paucity of remaining trials left, a massive reduction in mortality was found. They found a life-saving medicine in Covid. It was irrefutable. Yet they stated that this conclusion was of such “low certainty” it should not be acted on. “Trust the science,” folks.

It was disgusting.

The FLCCC sent out my white paper via press release, trying to disseminate it as far and wide as we could. We were the Bad News Bears trying to take down the Yankees. As always, not one major media science journalist in the world picked up the story. Not one country’s health-care leadership or government dared to object.

In that paper, I showed that even in the WHO’s corrupt guideline, they reported seventy deaths per 1000 in the standard-of-care treated patients versus fourteen deaths per 1000 in ivermectin-treated patients. That was an 81 percent reduction in mortality, even higher than what Tess had found. Let me repeat that: an 81 percent reduction in mortality. Remdesivir doesn’t do that. Paxlovid doesn’t do that. Molnupiravir doesn’t do that. Monoclonal antibodies don’t do that. And Owen had conflicts with three of these “competitors.”

The chart below is from the WHO guideline document, and it makes my blood boil. Look at the “Certainty of the Evidence” column and note they graded the evidence as having “very serious imprecision.” Downgrading the quality of the evidence to this degree based on imprecision is flat-out wrong when the treatment effect is so large, the outcome prevented is death, and the medicine is one of the safest, least expensive, and most widely available in the world. Had I had a seat at the committee table, I would have raged at this. But they don’t invite people like me onto captured regulatory agency committees, because I don’t take Pharma money. Never have. Never will.

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.